Main reference
Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2013). Keystroke Logging in Writing Research: Using Inputlog to Analyze and Visualize Writing Processes. Written Communication 30(3), 358-392
doi: 10.1177/0741088313491692 | PDF
Some publications by the UAntwerp Writing Research Group
about Inputlog and keystroke logging
Conijn, R., Spelz, E., C., Van Zaanen, M., Chukharev-Hudilainen, E., & Van Waes, L. (2022). A product and process oriented tagset for revisions in writing. Written Communication, 39(1), 97-128 | https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883211052104 | open access
Meulemans, C., Leijten, M., & De Maeyer, S.. (2022). The influence of age and verb transitivity on written sentence production. Clinical linguistics and phonetics, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2022.2109992
Rossetti, A., & Van Waes, L. (2022). It’s not just a phase: Investigating text simplification in a second language from a process and product perspective, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5:983008 | https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.983008
Luan Chau, T., Leijten, M., Bernolet, S., & Vangehuchten, L. (2022). Envisioning multilingualism in source-based writing in L1, L2, and L3 : the relation between source use and text quality? Frontiers in Psychology, 1-20 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.914125
Meulemans, C., Leijten, M, Van Waes L, Engelborghs S., & De Maeyer, S. (2022) Cognitive writing process characteristics in Alzheimer’s Disease, Frontiers in Psychology, 13 (872280) | https://doi.org/10.1007/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872280″
Rossetti, A., & Van Waes, L. (2022). Accessible communication of CSR: Development and preliminary evaluation of an online module. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 85(1), 52-79 | https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906221074324
Van Waes, L., Leijten, M., Roeser, J. Olive, T., & Grabowski, J. (2021). Measuring and assessing typing skills in writing research. Journal of Writing Research, 13(1), 107-153. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2021.13.01.04 | PDF (open access)
Van Waes, L., Vandersmissen, B., Rossetti, A., & Leijten, M. (2021). Inputlog Copy Task Corpus: Exploring and defining typing skills (1.05) [Data set]. Zenodo (Open Access). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5803400
Bowen, N., & Van Waes, L. (2020). Exploring revisions in academic text: Closing the gap between process and product approaches in digital writing. Written Communication, 37(3), 322-364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088320916508
Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2020). Designing keystroke logging research in writing studies. Chinese Journal of Second Language Writing [二语写作], 1(1), 18-39 | PDF
Vandermeulen, N., Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2020). Reporting writing process feedback in the classroom: Using keystroke logging data to reflect on writing processes. Journal of Writing Research, 12(1), 109-140. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2020.12.01.05 | PDF | video
Bowen, N., & Van Waes, L. (2020). Exploring revisions in academic text: Closing the gap between process and product approaches in digital writing. Written Communication, 37(3), 322-364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088320916508
Leijten, M., Van Waes, L., Schrijver, Bernolet, L., Vangehuchten, L. (2019). Mapping master’s students’ use of external sources in source-based writing in L1 and L2. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(3), 555-582. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000251
Conijn, R., Van Zaanen, M., Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2019). How to typo? Building a process-based model of typographic error revisions. Journal of Writing Analytics, 3, 69-95 | PDF
Van Waes, L., Leijten, M., Pauwaert, T., & Van Horenbeeck, E. (2019). A multilingual copy task: Measuring typing and motor skills in Writing with Inputlog. Journal of Open Research Software, 7(1:30), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.234
Leijten, M., Van Horenbeeck, E., & Van Waes, L. (2019). Analyzing keystroke logging data from a linguistic perspective. In K. Sullivan and E. Lindgren (Eds), Observing writing: Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting (pp. 71-95). Amsterdam: Brill. doi:10.1163/9789004392526_005
De Smedt, M., Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2018). Exploring the Process of Reading during Writing Using Eye Tracking and Keystroke Logging. Written Communication, (35)4, 411–447. doi:10.1177/0741088318788070
Van Waes, L., Leijten, M., Mariën, P., & Engelborghs, S. (2017). Typing competencies in Alzheimer’s disease: An exploration of copy tasks. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 311-319 | doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.050.
Schrijver, I., Van Vaerenbergh, L., Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2016). The impact of writing training on transediting in translation, analysed from a product and process perspective. Perspectives: Studies in translatology, 24(2), 218-234 | doi: 10.1080/0907676X.2015.1040034.
Van Waes, L., Leijten, M., Lindgren, E., & Wengelin, A. (2015). Keystroke logging in writing research: Analyzing online writing processes. In C.A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of Writing Research, pp. 410-426. New York, NY: Guilford Press | more info .
Van Waes, L., & Leijten, M. (2015). Fluency in writing: A multidimensional perspective on writing fluency applied to L1 and L2. Computers and Composition: An International Journal, 38, 79-95. doi: 10.1016/j.compcom.2015.09.012
Leijten, M., Van Horenbeeck, E., & Van Waes, L. (2015). Analyzing writing process data: A linguistic perspective. In G. Cislaru (Ed.), Writing(s) at the crossroads: the process-product interface (pp.277-302). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. ISBN: 978 90 272 5802 1. doi: 10.1075/Z.194
Van Waes, L., Van Weijen, D., & Leijten, M. (2014). Learning to write in an online writing center: The effect of learning styles on the writing process. Computers & Education, 73, 60-71. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.12.009 | PDF
Leijten, M., Van Waes, L., Schriver, K., & Hayes, J. R. (2014). Writing in the workplace: Constructing documents using multiple digital sources. Journal of Writing Research, 5(3), 285-336. (www.jowr.org) | PDF
Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2013). Keystroke Logging in Writing Research: Using Inputlog to Analyze and Visualize Writing Processes. Written Communication 30(3), 358–392 | doi: 10.1177/0741088313491692 | PDF
Van Waes, L., Leijten, M., Wengelin, A., & Lindgren, E. (2012). Logging tools to study digital writing processes. In V. W. Berninger (Ed.), Past, present, and future contributions of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology (pp. 507-533). New York/Sussex: Taylor & Francis. [ISBN: 9781848729636] – more info
Leijten, M., Macken, L., Hoste, V., Van Horenbeeck, E., & Van Waes, L. (2012). From Character to Word Level: Enabling the Linguistic Analyses of Inputlog Process Data. In M. Piotrowski, C. Mahlow & R. Dale (Eds.), Linguistic and Cognitive Aspects of Document Creation and Document Engineering. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Writing (Avignon, CLW 2012) (pp. 1-8). ACL: Stroudsburg, PA [ISBN 978-1-937284-19-0] | PDF
Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2012). Inputlog 4.0: Keystroke Logging in Writing Research. In M. Torrance, D. Alamargot, M. Castelló, F. Ganier, O. Kruse, A. Mangen, L. Tolchinsky & L. Van Waes (Eds.), Learning to Write Effectively: Current Trends in European Research (Studies in Writing, Vol. 25, pp. 363-366). Bingley: Emerald. | doi: 10.1108/S1572-6304(2012)0000025087 | ISSN 1572-6304 | more info.
Macken, L., Hoste, V., Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L.(2012). From keystrokes to annotated process data: Enriching the output of Inputlog with linguistic information. In N. Calzolari et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’12), pp. 2224-2229. European Language Resources Association (ELRA): Istanbul, Turkey [ISBN: 978-2-9517408-7-7] | PDF
Leijten, M. (2007). Writing and Speech Recognition: Observing error correction strategies of professional writers (Chapter 7). Lot publications, Utrecht. ISBN 978-90-78328-31-5 | PDF
Leijten, M. & Van Waes, L. (2006). Inputlog: New Perspectives on the Logging of On-Line Writing. In K.P.H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Studies in Writing: Vol. 18. Computer Key-Stroke Logging and Writing: Methods and Applications (pp.73-94). Oxford: Elsevier. | PDF
Van Waes, L. , & Leijten, M. (2006). Logging writing processes with Inputlog. In L. Van Waes, M. Leijten & C. Neuwirth (Vol. Eds.), & G. Rijlaarsdam (Series Ed.), Studies in Writing: Vol. 17. Writing and Digital Media (pp. 158-166). Oxford: Elsevier | PDF
Leijten, Mariëlle & Van Waes, Luuk (2005). Inputlog: A logging tool for the research of writing processes. Research Paper University of Antwerp, Department of Management – Faculty of Applied Economics (# 2005/011), 22 p. | PDF
Related publications in which Inputlog has been used
(various languages)
Below you find articles in which Inputlog has been used as a research instrument.
Would you like to have your publication here too?
Please e-mail a PDF of the written document and a link where we can find more information.
Highlight:
Lindgren, E., & Sullivan, K. (Eds.) (2019). Observing writing: Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting. (Series: Studies in Writing, Volume: 38). Amsterdam: Brill. | more info
Abdel Latif, M. M. (2008). A state-of-the-art review of the real-time computer-aided study of the writing process. IJES, International journal of English Studies, 8(1), 29-50.
Adibi Dahaj, M. (2012). Analyzing Learners’ Language Awareness in Written Production : Product-Oriented vs. Process-Oriented Approaches. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-87276
Ameri, A., & Pourniksefat, Z. (2017). Writers on the move: Visualizing composing processes involved in academic writing. Journal of Language and Translation, 7(4), 1-20 – PDF
Asaf, M., & Kozminsky, E. (2011). Writing Processes with Word Processors Paper presented at the Chais conference on instructional technologies research 2011: Learning in the technological era Raanana, The Open University of Israel.
Asker-Árnason, L., Wengelin, Å., & Sahlén, B. (2008). Process and product in writing-a methodological contribution to the assessment of written narratives in 8-12-year-old Swedish children using ScriptLog. Logopedics Phonatrics Vocology, 33(3), 143-152.
Baaijen, V. M., Galbraith, D., & de Glopper, K. (2012). Keystroke Analysis Reflections on Procedures and Measures. Written Communication, 29(3), 246-277.
Baaijen, V., Galbraith, D., & de Glopper, K. (2012). Explaining Knowledge Change Through Writing. In M. Torrance, D. Alamargot, M. Castelló, F. Ganier, O. Kruse, A. Mangen, L. Tolchinsky & L. Van Waes (Eds.), Learning to Write Effectively: Current Trends in European Research (pp. 150-154). Bingley: Emerald.
Barbier, M. L., Piolat, A., Roussey, J. Y., & Raby, F. (2008). Notetaking and writing from hypertexts in L1 and L2: cognitive effort and language procedures. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 156, 31-50.
Barbier, M. L., & Spinelli-Jullien, N. (2009). On-line tools for investigating writing strategies in L2. German as a foreign language.
Braaksma, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Janssen, T. (2007). Writing hypertexts: Proposed effects on writing processes and knowledge acquisition. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 7(4).
Braaksma, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., & van den Bergh, H. (2009). Hypertext writing: effects on writing processes and writing products.
Braaksma, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., & van den Bergh, H. (2010). Hypertext writing versus linear writing: Effects on pause locations and production activities and its relation with text quality. Paper presented at the Paper presented at the SIG Writing Conference, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christensen, T. P. (2011). “Studies on the Mental Processes in Translation Memory assisted Translation-the State of the Art. trans-?kom, 4(2), 137-160.
Demaree, D. (2006). Toward understanding writing to learn in physics: Investigating student writing. The Ohio State University.
Ehrensberger-Dow, M., & Kiinzli, A. (2010). Methods of accessing metalinguistic awareness: a question of quality? New Approaches in Translation Process Research, 39, 113.
Ehrensberger-Dow, M., & Perrin, D. (2009). Capturing translation processes: a multi-method approach. Across Languages and Cultures, 20(2), 275-288.
Franklin, S. V., & Hermsen, L. M. (2014). Real-time capture of student reasoning while writing. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 10(2), 020121.
Galbraith, D., Baaijen, V., Smith-Spark, J., & Torrance, M. (2012). The Effects of Dyslexia on the Writing Processes of Students in Higher Education. In M. Torrance, D. Alamargot, M. Castelló, F. Ganier, O. Kruse, A. Mangen, L. Tolchinsky & L. Van Waes (Eds.), Learning to Write Effectively: Current Trends in European Research (pp. 167-171). Bingley: Emerald.
Geerligs, S., & voor Communicatiestudies, M. (2010). Schrijven is georganiseerde spontaniteit! Master, University of Utrecht, Utrecht.
Göpferich, S. (2008). Translationsprozessforschung: Stand, Methoden, Perspektiven (Vol. 4): BoD-Books on Demand.
Groenendijk, T. (2012). Observe and explore: empirical studies about learning in creative writing and the visual arts. PhD, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
Groenendijk, T., Janssen, T., Rijlaarsdam, G., & van den Bergh, H. (2011). The effect of observational learning on students’ performance, processes, and motivation in two creative domains. British Journal of Educational Psychology.
Hart, M. t., Van den Bergh, H., & Sanders, T. J. M. (2006). Ganzenveer versus tekstverwerker: Over de invloed van schrijfervarenheid en schrijfmedium op tekstkwaliteit. Master Thesis Master, Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht. Retrieved from http://igitur-archive.library.uu.nl/student-theses/2007-0328-200227/scriptie_ganzenveerversustekstverwerker.pdf
Hoàng, T. D. H. (2015). Metaphorical language in second language learners’ essays: Products and processes. PhD, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
Heine, C. (2008). Modell zur Produktion von Online-Hilfen: PHD-afhandling: Frank & Timme GmbH.
Jakobsen, A. L. (2011). Tracking translators’ keystrokes and eye movements with Translog. Methods and Strategies of Process Research: Integrative Approaches in Translation Studies, 94, 37.
Janssen, T., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2006). Observational learning in Cultural and Arts Education; Effects on students’ creative processes, products and motivation in creative writing and visual arts.
Kieft, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., Galbraith, D., & Bergh, H. (2007). The effects of adapting a writing course to students’ writing strategies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 565-578.
Kieft, M. H. (2006). The effects of adapting writing instruction to students’ writing strategies: ICO.
Lardilleux, A., Fleury, S., & Cislaru, G. (2013). Allongos: Longitudinal Alignment for the Genetic Study of Writers’ Drafts Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (pp. 537-548): Springer.
Leijten, M., Janssen, D., & Van Waes, L. (2010). Error correction strategies of professional speech recognition users: Three profiles. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 964–975. PDF: | doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.010 | PDF.
Leijten, M., D. Janssens, & Van Waes, L. (2009). Correctiestrategieën van professionele spraakherkenningsgebruikers tijdens het schrijven van zakelijke teksten [Correction strategies of professional users of speech recognition writing professional reports]. In: W. Spooren, J. Sanders & M. Onrust (red.), Studies in Taalbeheersing 3. Assen: Van Gorcum, p. 233-246 [ISBN 978 90 232 4621 3].
Lindgren, E., Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2012). Adapting to the reader during writing. Written Language & Literacy, 14(2), 188-223 | doi 10.1075/wll.14.2.02lin | issn 1387-6732 / e-issn 1570-6001.
Luyckx, B., Delbeke, T., Van Waes, L., Leijten, M., & Remael, A. (2010). Live Subtitling with Speech Recognition: Causes and Consequences of Text Reduction. Antwerp: Artesis working Papers in Translation Studies 2010-1 | PDF
Luyckx, B., Delbeke, T., Van Waes, L., Leijten, M., & Remael, A. (2010). Live Subtitling with Speech Recognition: Causes and Consequences of Text Reduction. Antwerp: Research paper University of Antwerp 2010:10 | PDF
Macgilchrist, F., & Van Hout, T. (2010). Framing the news: an ethnographic view of financial newswriting. Text & Talk – An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies, 30(2), 169-191.
Macgilchrist, F., & Van Hout, T. (2011). Ethnographic discourse analysis and social science. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1).
Milicka, J., & Chromý, J. (2012). Experimentální zkoumání stylotvorných faktor?: první výstupy [Experimental research on style-forming factors: first outcomes]. Our Speech, 4, 6.
Mauer, B. (2006). Proposal for a Monument to Lost Data. Writing and Digital Media (Studies in Writing, Volume 17), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 17, 287-309.
Miller, K. S., Lindgren, E., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2008). The psycholinguistic dimension in second language writing: Opportunities for research and pedagogy using computer keystroke logging. TESOL Quarterly, 42(3), 433-454.
Morgan, J. H., Cheng, C.-Y., Pike, C., & Ritter, F. E. (2013). A Design, Tests and Considerations for Improving Keystroke and Mouse Loggers. Interacting with Computers.
Nyström, P. (2008). Elevers könsmärkning av matematik-Kvantitativ metod i forskning om föreställningar. Redaktörer: Carina Rönnqvist och Monika Vinterek Omslag: Olivia Vinterek Tryck: Print & Media, Umeå universitet 2004519, Umeå 2008 ISBN 978-91-7264-598-1 ISSN 1651-0127, 151.
Pérez-Paredes, P., Sánchez-Tornel, M., Calero, J. M. A., & Jimenez, P. A. (2011). Tracking learners’ actual uses of corpora: guided vs non-guided corpus consultation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(3), 233-253.
Quinlan, T., Loncke, M., Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2012). Coordinating the Cognitive Processes of Writing: The Role of the Monitor. Written Communication 29(3), 345 – 368| doi: 10.1177/0741088312451112 | PDF
Remael, A., Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2014). Live subtitling with speech recognition: How to pinpoint the challenges? In A.-D. Dror (Ed.), Media and translation: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 121-148). New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic | website
Renkema, J. (2009). Discourse, of course: An overview of research in discourse studies: John Benjamins Pub Co.
Rijlaarsdam, G., Braaksma, M., Couzijn, M., Janssen, T., Kieft, M., Raedts, M., et al. (2009). The role of readers in writing development: Writing students bringing their texts to the test. The SAGE handbook of writing development, 436.
Rijlaarsdam, G. C. W., Braaksma, M. A. H., Couzijn, M. J., Janssen, T. M., Raedts, M., Van Steendam, E., et al. (2008). Observation of peers in learning to write: Practice and research. Journal of writing research, 1, 53-83.
Rodriguez, H., & Eklundh, K. S. (2007). Supporting Individual Views and Mutual Awareness in a Collaborative Writing Task: The Case of Colo laboracio. STUDIES IN WRITING, 20, 323.
Robert, I. S., & Van Waes, L. (2014). Selecting a translation revision procedure: Do common sense and statistics agree? Perspectives: Studies in Translatology, 22(3), 304-320 | doi: 10.1080/0907676x.2013.871047 | PDF
Schrijver, I., Van Vaerenbergh, L., & Van Waes, L. (2010). Transediting in students’ translation processes Artesis working Papers in Translation Studies.
Schrijver, I., Van Vaerenbergh, L., & Van Waes, L. (2011). Transediting in students’ translation processes. Antwerp: Artesis working Papers in Translation Studies 2010-3 | PDF
Schrijver, I., Van Vaerenbergh, L., & Van Waes, L. (2012). An Exploratory Study of Transediting in Students’ Translation Processes. Hermes, Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 49, 99-117 | PDF
Schrijver, I., Van Vaerenbergh, L., Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2014). The translator as a writer: Measuring the effect of writing skills on the translation product. In D. Knorr, C. Heine & J. Engberg (Eds.), Methods in writing process research (pp. 99-122). Frankfurt am Mein: Peter Lang | more info
Tillema, M., van den Bergh, H., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Sanders, T. (2011). Relating self reports of writing behaviour and online task execution using a temporal model. Metacognition and Learning, 1-25.
Van Hout, T. (2007). Analyzing journalistic discourse practices (and winking at CDA). In K. Pelsmaekers & C. Rollo (Eds.), Economically Speaking. Essays in honour of Chris Braecke (pp. 325). Leuven: Garant.
Van Hout, T., Pander Maat, H., & De Preter, W. (2011). Writing from news sources: The case of Apple TV. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(7), 1876-1889.
Van Waes, L., Leijten, M., & Van Weijen, D.(2009). Keystroke logging in writing research: Observing writing processes with Inputlog. GFL-German as a foreign language 2/3, 41-64 | ISSN 1470-9570 | PDF
Van Waes, L., Delbeke, T., Leijten, M., & Remael, A. (2009). Live-ondertiteling met spraakherkenning: Een case-analyse van reductie en fouten [Live subtitling with speech recognition: a case analysis of reduction and errors]. In: W. Spooren, J. Sanders & M. Onrust (red.), Studies in Taalbeheersing 3. Assen: Van Gorcum, p. 371-390 [ISBN 978 90 232 4621 3].
Van Waes, L., Leijten, M., & Remael, A. (2013). Live subtitling with speech recognition: Causes and consequences of text reduction. Across Languages and Cultures, 14(1), 15-46. doi: 10.1556/Acr.14.2013.1.2 | PDF
Van Waes, L., & Mangen, A. (2012). Tools for Studying and Supporting Writing: Technological Advances in Writing Research. In M. Torrance, D. Alamargot, M. Castelló, F. Ganier, O. Kruse, A. Mangen, L. Tolchinsky & L. Van Waes (Eds.), Learning to Write Effectively: Current Trends in European Research (Studies in Writing, Vol. 25, pp. 345 – 349). Bingley: Emerald | DOI: 10.1108/S1572-6304(2012)0000025083 | ISSN 1572-6304 | more info.
Van Weijen, D. (2009). Writing processes, text quality, and task effects; empirical studies in first and second language writing. LOT Dissertation Series, 201.
Weder, M. (2010). Keystroke-Logging und Stimulated-Recall in der Orthographie-Forschung. Bulletin suisse de linguistique appliquée, 91(3-4), 85-104.
Xu, X. (2007). English language attrition by Chinese university-level students. Unpublished Report. Centre for Language and Cognition Groningen, University of Groningen.
Yagi, S. M., & Al-Salman, S. (2011). Using tracking software for writing instruction. Studies in Second Language, 1(2), 209-225.
Zapata, J., & Kirkedal, A.S (2015). Assessing the Performance of Automatic Speech Recognition Systems When Used by Native and Non-Native Speakers of Three Major Languages in Dictation Workflows, Proceedings of the 20th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics, NODALIDA 2015, May 11-13, 2015, Vilnius, Lithuania | PDF
Dutch publications
Schrijver, I., & Van Waes, L. (2022). Als manuscripten van de wereld verdwijnen: Een digitale blik in de keuken van de literaire vertaler. [If manuscripts disappear from the world: A digital look into the kitchen of the literary translator]. Filter | online version
Van Waes, L., Van Weijen, D., & Leijten, M. (2013). Het effect van leerstijlen op het schrijfproces in een online schrijfcentrum. In R. Boogaert & H. Jansen (red.), Studies in Taalbeheersing 4, (p.339-350). Assen: Koninklijke Van Gorcum.
Van Waes, L., & Leijten, M. (2013). Vlot schrijven: Een multidimensioneel perspectief op ‘writing fluency’. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 35(2), 160-182.
Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2007). Schrijven (z)onder handen: Het gebruik van procesregistraties in het schrijfonderwijs [Writing without hands: Using process registration in writing instruction]. In A. Van Gelderen (Ed.), Het schoolvak Nederlands (HSN21) (pp. 121-123). Gent: Academia Press.
Van Waes, L., Leijten, M. & Van der Geest, T. (Eds.) (2006). Methoden en instrumenten voor schrijf- en leesonderzoek [SPECIAL ISSUE: Methods and Instruments for Reading and Writing Research]. Themanummer: Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 28(3).
Leijten, M. & Van Waes, L. (2006). Schrijfprocessen registreren met Inputlog: Een data-analyse van de interactie met de ‘reeds geproduceerde tekst [Observing Writing Processes with Inputlog: A Data Analysis of the Interaction with the Text Produced so Far]. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 28(3), 198-219.
Chinese publications
Xu, C. (2021). A pausological approach to the cognitive processes in Chinese EFL Learners’ narrative and argumentative writings. Foreign Language Education, 42(1): 35-40.
徐翠芹. (2021). 写作停顿视角下的中国英语学习者记叙文和议论文写作认知加工过程研究. 《外语教学》, 42(1): 35-40.
Xu, C. (2018). Understanding online revisions in L2 writing: A computer keystroke-log perspective, System. 78, 104-114 | doi 10.1016/j.system.2018.08.007 | PDF
Xu, C. (2017). A temporal investigation of L2 writing process—A pausological perspective. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 49 (4): 583-595.
徐翠芹. (2017). 写作停顿视角下的二语写作过程研究. 《外语教学与研究》, 49 (4): 583-595.
Nie, Y. J. (2014). Analysis of EFL Learners’ Writing Process in China: Comparison Between English Major and Non-English Major Learners. Studies in Literature and Language, 9 (1), 72-76 | doi: 10.3968/5236 | PDF
XU, C. (2011). Integrating Inputlog and Screen Recorder: New Research Insights Into the EFL Writing Process. Computer-assisted Foreign Language Education, 141, 21-25 | PDF
Reference
If you publish or present a paper in which Inputlog has been used, please refer to the following article:
Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2013). Keystroke Logging in Writing Research: Using Inputlog to Analyze Writing Processes. Written Communication 30(3), 358-392
DOI: 10.1177/0741088313491692
PDF
Creative Commons
Inputlog is published under the following Creative Commons licence:
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives | 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
